Allahabad High Court
A482/10017/2025 of GAURAV DIVEDI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10017 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed with a prayer
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10017 of 2025
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.
2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 21.5.2020 and cognizance order dated 21.7.2020 as well as entire criminal proceedings in Criminal case (State vs. Gaurav Dwivedi) under Sections 411, 414, 468, 471, 419, 420 IPC arising out of FIR No.88 of 2020, Police Station Akhandnagar, District Sultanpur pending before Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate, Kadipur, District Sultanpur.
3. At the very outset, counsel for the applicant states that the offence is punishable upto seven years and applicant will apply for bail. However, he has submitted that the applicant may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (AIR 2022 SC 3386).
4. It is therefore, directed that in case the applicant applies for bail before the Court concerned within one week from today, the court below will decide the said bail application within two weeks thereafter taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
5. For a period of three weeks. no coercive action shall be taken against Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravi Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Gaurav Divedi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
the applicant in the aforesaid case.
6. The application stands disposed of.
7. It is made clear that no application for extension of time shall be entertained if this order is not availed by the applicant in the stipulated period of time. December 18, 2025 Pks A482 No. 10017 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench