Allahabad High Court

WRIC/12094/2025 of RAM SUNDAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 9 OTHERS on 18 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12094 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel who appears on behalf of the Opposite party nos.1 to 5. 2. This petition has

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - C No. - 12094 of 2025

Court No. - 2

HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.

HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel who appears on behalf of the Opposite party nos.1 to 5.

2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:- " I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of the mandamus commanding the opposite parties concerned to take necessary action in respect of grievances of the petitioner raised in their application 18.11.2025 as contained in annexure no.1 to this writ petition and also protect their purchased land/plot of Gata no. 168 measuring area 0.1170 hect, 67.65 sq.mt. situated in Village Gangapurva, Gauspur, Gopala saraya, P.O. Gopala Sarai, Tehsil Jamunha, District- Shrawasti to be grabbed by the opposite party no. 6 to 10 by getting stopped the illegal construction on the aforesaid land of petitioner by complying the order 26.07.2025 passed by the civil Judge (Junior Division Shrawasti in case 396/2025 Ram Sundar Vs Pahalwan and others and also take the necessary action against the opposite party 6 to 10 in the interest of justice.

II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of the Mandamus commanding the opposite parties concerned to consider and decide the application dated 18.11.2025 as contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition in the interest o justice."

3. It has been submitted that the Respondent nos.6 and 7 are Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Sundar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s)

deliberately encroaching upon the land of the petitioner. The petitioner had filed a case for Permanent Injunction in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shrawasti, registered as Original Suit No.396 of 2025 [Ram Sundar Vs. Pahalwan and others] where an ad-interim injunction has been granted on 26.07.2025 but the same is not being respected by the private-respondents. The petitioner has therefore, approached the police station concerned by way of an application on 18.11.2025.

4. This petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shrawasti, in his case pending before the said Court by way of an application under Order 39 Rule 2A. December 18, 2025 N.PAL WRIC No. 12094 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- NARESH PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead