Allahabad High Court

BAIL/12923/2025 of MANISH @ MAGAN SHUKLA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 18 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12923 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 364 of 2025, under sections

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12923 of 2025

Court No. - 12

HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 364 of 2025, under sections 376(2)(n), 504, 506 IPC and Section 5/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Bachhrawan, District Raebareli.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that informant was studying in graduation and around two years ago the applicant who is cousin bother of informant administered something because of which she became hypnotized and on false pretext of marriage physical relation were formed and subsequently his family is refusing to marry her. The tentative age of the victim is around 18 years as per the statement under Section 180 BNSS.

4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

5. Considering the fact that the relationship continued in between them for a span of almost 2 years and the fact that the marriage was not even permissible in terms of degree of prohibition in between them, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 19.9.2023 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

6. Let the applicant Manish @ Magan Shukla be released on bail in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suman Lata, Anita Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manish @ Magan Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)

aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 18, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 12923 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead