Allahabad High Court
CRLP/516/2023 of RAJ KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 516 of 2023 WITH CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 373 of 2023 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate on the basis of instructions dated 05.12.2025 received
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 516 of 2023
WITH
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 373 of 2023
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Additional Government Advocate on the basis of instructions dated 05.12.2025 received from Shri Rakesh Kharwar, Sub-Inspector, Police Station - Akbarpur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, submits that final report no. B-22/23 dated 15.02.2023 has been submitted in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate on 18.05.2023, therefore, these petitions have rendered infructuous. He further submits that other connected writ petitions have wrongly been connected with this Bunch, as they are of different Police Station and some of them have also been decided.
2. Shri Prashant Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Raj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Arvind Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
petitioner could not dispute the contention put forth by learned Additional Government Advocate, in view of the final report forwarded.
3. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed.
4. It is further provided that other connected petitions shall be delinked from this bunch of petitions and listed separately before the appropriate Bench. December 18, 2025 Lokesh Kumar CRLP No. 516 of 2023 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench