Allahabad High Court
A227/7309/2025 of SIDDHARTH UPADHYAY Vs BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. LKO. THRU. CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7309 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for State-respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed issuance of notice to the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7309 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for State-respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed issuance of notice to the private respondent is dispensed with.
3. By means of the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made to enter name of the petitioner in Revenue Record in pursuance of the order dated 29.12.1996 passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Kadipur, District - Sultanpur, U/S 33/39 of U.P. Land Revenue Act bearing Case No. 375 (Devendra Pratap and others Vs. State of U.P.) pending before respondent No. 3, expeditiously.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection and submits that petitioner has efficacious remedy of moving appropriate application under Para 460 of Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders passed by revenue authorities and without approaching the competent authority, present writ petition has been filed.
4. In light of the above, considering that the petitioner has efficacious remedy of moving appropriate application under Para 460 of Revenue Court Manual, this Court declines to interfere with the present matter.
Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla, Shyam Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Siddharth Upadhyay .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lko. Thru. Chairman And Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Accordingly, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an application under para 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual, before the competent authority within two weeks from today and in case such an application is made within the prescribed period, the said authority is directed to proceed to consider and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. December 18, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 7309 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench