Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12383/2025 of SUBHANI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. HOME SECY. LKO. on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12383 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 3. The
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12383 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.108 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 110, 115, 351(2), 352, 191(3), 105, 117(2) of BNS, Police Station Malihabad, District Lucknow.
4. In terms of the FIR, general allegations were levelled against as many as 13 accused persons of causing the offence without there being anything specific against any of the accused. The co-accused Saleem has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 10.12.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.10294 of 2025. The applicant is aged about 76 years as per the submission of the Counsel for the applicant.
5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
6. Considering the nature of the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the accused; the age of the victim and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 15.10.202, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Subhani be released on bail in the abovesaid first Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lokendra Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Subhani .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Home Secy. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
information report number on her furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 18, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12383 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench