Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11973/2025 of HASEEB AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11973 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard. 2. Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No. 0403 of 2025, under Sections 85, 82 (1), 115 (2), 351 (3), of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11973 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No. 0403 of 2025, under Sections 85, 82 (1), 115 (2), 351 (3), of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Sirsiya, District Srawasti.
3. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Vishal Shukla, Sub Inspector, Police Station- Sirsiya District- Srawasti dated 17.12.2025 states that a charge sheet dated 14.12.2025 has been submitted.
4. Learned AGA further points out that the charge sheet has been filed after collecting credible evidence from perusal of which it emerges that prima facie the crime committed by the petitioner/accused is borne out.
5. Considering the aforesaid, the Court is not expected to hold a mini trial in order to verify the allegations as levelled in the FIR and the charge sheet vis-a-vis the grounds as taken by the petitioner in the instant petition keeping in view the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and others; 2025 INSC 1287.
6. Even otherwise, having considered the allegations as levelled in the FIR vis-a-vis the grounds taken by the petitioner in the writ petition no Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Haseeb And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
case on merits is made out.
7. Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to them.
8. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. December 18, 2025 Pachhere/- CRLP No. 11973 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench