Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14783/2025 of KRISHNA KUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. P.W.D. U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 18 December 2025

Cites 1, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14783 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner(s) and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14783 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner(s) and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.

2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to provide pension along with all consequential benefits by including service rendered by petitioners as work charge employees for purposes of qualifying service for pensionary benefits. Prayer has also been made for grant of pay-scale, benefits of assured career progression and all consequential benefits.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner has relied upon judgment rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and others reported in (2019) 10 SCC 516 as well as judgment rendered by this Court in Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others [WRIT - A No. - 731 of 2024].

4. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representations before opposite party no.1 i.e. Additional Chief Secretary/Principal Secretary, Public Works Department U.P., Civil Secretariat, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such representations are filed, the same are required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously in the light of aforesaid judgments in case the same are applicable, within a period of eight weeks from receipt of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Krishna Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. P.W.D. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

representation(s) of petitioners along with a certified copy of this order.

5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. December 18, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 14783 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead