Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12932/2025 of JUVENILE A THRU. NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER IN CASE CRIME NO. 320/2024 Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12932 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.320 of 2024, under
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12932 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.320 of 2024, under Sections 103(1), 140(2), 238, 3(5) of BNS, Police Station Sakran, District Sitapur.
3. This is the second bail application. The first bail application was rejected with liberty to file fresh bail application vide order dated 04.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12477 of 2024.
4. While arguing the second bail application, the Counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant was not named in the FIR. Subsequently, his name surfaced in the statement of the informant recorded subsequently along with the statement of the co-accused. All the co-accused have been enlarged on bail vide separate orders, which are on record as Annexure-12 to the bail application and two of the bail orders have provided across the bar.
5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
6. Considering the fact that the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co-accused, who have been enlarged on bail and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ratnesh Trivedi, Vibhuti Narayan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Juvenile A Thru. Natural Guardian Father In Case Crime No. 320/2024 .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
since 05.09.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Juvenile A Thru. Natural Guardian Father In Case Crime No. 320/2024 be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 18, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12932 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench