Allahabad High Court
WRIC/12133/2025 of PRABHAWATI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 5 OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12133 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.6- Gram Sabha and learned Standing Counsel, who appears
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 12133 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.6- Gram Sabha and learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-respondent Nos.1 to 5.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has alleged contemptuous behaviour on the part of the Gram Pradhan of Gram Sabha Ishipur, Block Pratappur Kamaicha, Tehsil Lambhua, District Sultanpur. He has pointed out the order passed by this Court on 19.11.2025 in Writ-C No.10760 of 2025 filed as Annexure-1 to the petition.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has produced before this Court instructions sent by the Sub Inspector, P.S. Kotwali Chanda, District Sultanpur and also by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lambhua, Sultanpur. In the instructions sent by the SDM, Lambhua, Sultanpur, it has been stated that new Gata No.392/0.2440 hectare has been carved out of old Gata Nos.152, 153/2 minjumla and 154 minjumla. The said land of Gata No.392 is recorded in the name of the petitioner, Prabhawati. No construction of any road has been carried out on land belonging to the petitioner. Chak marg has been constructed on Gata No.350/0.0530 hectare by the Gram Panchayat by overlying it with kharanja.
4. This petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate demarcation application under Section 24 before the revenue court concerned in terms of Rule 22 of the Rules. The said application, if moved after completing all formalities within two weeks from today, shall be decided by the competent court at the earliest, by giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned, including Gaon Sabha, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months thereafter. December 18, 2025 Shubhankar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dilip Kumar Pandey, Anurag Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Prabhawati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench