Allahabad High Court
WRIC/12099/2025 of ANIL KUMAR AWASTHI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12099 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State Respondents. 2. This petition has been filed with
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 12099 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
8
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State Respondents.
2. This petition has been filed with the following prayers :- "(I) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties especially opposite party no.2 to 4 to issue a character certificate in favour of the petitioner, in the interest of justice. (II) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the opposite party no.2 to decide the representation filed before him by the petitioner, in the interest of justice."
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner says that his application for issuance of character certificate has been rejected by a cryptic order. A similarly situated petitioner Pawan Kumar Dubey had filed a Writ Petition before this Court bearing Writ-C No.7006 of 2025: Pawan Kumar Dubey Vs. State of U.P. and others, Neutral Citation No.- 2025:AHC-LKO:44647-DB, which has been disposed of by the Coordinate Bench by its order dated 01.08.2025, a copy of which has been filed as annexure to the petition.
4. We have gone through the judgement and order dated 01.08.2025.
5. Let the Competent Authority comply with the judgement rendered in Anil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others passed in Writ-C No.718 of 2025, and decide the representation dated 29.09.2025 and pass an order within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. December 18, 2025 Darpan Sharma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Chandra Tewari, Chandra Bhushan Panday Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Anil Kumar Awasthi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench