Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11988/2025 of INDRA MANI UPADHYAY Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11988 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Sri Purnendu Chakrawarti, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Pranjal Jail, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11988 of 2025
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Purnendu Chakrawarti, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Pranjal Jail, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vipul Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. appearing for the opposite party nos. 1,3 to 9. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.2 is hereby dispensed with, as no prejudice is being caused to the opposite party no. 2 by this order.
2. By means of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the Respondent No. 3,4 &5 to initiate the appropriate proceedings on the basis of the application contained as Annexure No. 1 to this Writ Petition.
ii. Issue a writ, order, direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 3,4 & 5 to investigate the matter or constitute Special Investigation Team for investigation."
3. After arguing at some length, Sri Punendu Chakrawarti, learned Senior Advocate has requested that he may be permitted to not press the prayer no. 2, at this stage and for the prayer no. 2 he may take any appropriate remedy before any appropriate court of law.
4. Considering the aforesaid request, Sri Punendu Chakrawarti, learned Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pranjal Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : G A. Indra Mani Upadhyay .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
Senior Advocate is permitted to delete prayer no. 2 from the prayer clause during the course of the day.
5. So far as the prayer no. 1 is concerned, Sri Chakrawari has drawn attention of this Court towards Annexure No. 1, which is a detailed representation dated 31.10.2025 preferred by the petitioner to District Magistrate, Sultanpur enclosing therewith the relevant documents/material. He has further submitted that the District Magistrate has not taken any decision on the aforesaid representation, therefore, a direction may be issued to the District Magistrate, Sultanpur to dispose of the aforesaid representation strictly in accordance with law by speaking and reasoned order, which would suffice interest of justice.
6. Therefore, after hearing learned counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, we, hereby, dispose of this writ petition finally at the admission stage directing the District Magistrate, Sultanpur to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 31.10.2025, which has been annexed as Annexure No. 1 by speaking and reasoned order by affording an opportunity of hearing to the opposite party no. 2 and other concerning parties, if any, within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order and decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith.
7. In view of the aforesaid terms, the present writ petition is disposed of finally. . December 18 , 2025 Anuj Singh CRLP No. 11988 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench