Allahabad High Court
NABAIL/2016/2025 of VEER BAHADUR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 2016 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.953 of 2025, under Sections 3(5), 108, 352, 351(3) BNS, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Barabanki.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co accused Shubham Verma, Umakant Upadhyay and Ranjeet Mohan Shukla @ Ranjeet Shukla with similar allegations have been enlarged on anticipatory bail vide order dated 13.11.2025, 13.11.2025 and 11.12.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS Nos. 1642 of 2025, 1708 of 2025 and 1988 of 2025.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering and adopting the same reasoning, prima facie, case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed.
6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Veer Bahadur Singh be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on his furnishing personal Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Indra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Veer Bahadur Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
bond of Rs 5000/- to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions:
(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation;
(ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and
(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. December 18, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 2016 of 2025
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench