Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12821/2025 of AMIT KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12821 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.300 of 2025, under
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12821 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.300 of 2025, under Section 85, 80(2) of BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Pisawan, District Sitapur.
3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the co-accused Lalta Prasad has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 10.12.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12381 of 2025 and also the co- accused Anil has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 09.12.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12077 of 2025. The applicant is the husband of the deceased.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the postmortem report indicating no injury except for ligature mark and two contusions, which are on right thigh and leg, which according to the applicant had occurred while lowing the body, and there being nothing against the applicant to suggest that soon before her death, the victim was subjected to any physical or mental harassment in relation to any demand of dowry coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 16.07.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rishabh Pandey, Navneet Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Amit Kumar be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 18, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12821 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench