Allahabad High Court

A227/7301/2025 of LUCKY VERMA Vs TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL BIKAPUR, AYODHYA AND 2 OTHERS on 18 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7301 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7301 of 2025

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.

3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the State-respondent to decide Mutation Case No. 2610/2025, Computerized Case No. T-202504230302610 (Lucky Varma Vs. Harish Chandra), U/S 34 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.

4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case State-respondent considers and decides the aforesaid appeal in the time bound manner.

6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Bikapur, District Ayodhya is directed to decide Mutation Case No. 2610/2025, Computerized Case No. T-202504230302610 (Lucky Varma Vs. Harish Chandra), U/S 34 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Lucky Verma .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar, Tehsil Bikapur, Ayodhya And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.

8. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.

9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 18, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 7301 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead