Allahabad High Court
A482/10771/2025 of ANUJ KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10771 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Sri Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party nos.2 and 3, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10771 of 2025
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Sri Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party nos.2 and 3, which is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 and 3 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To set aside the entire criminal proceedings of Case No.0568 of 2017 "State Vs Anuj Kumar & Others" pending in the Court of Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow arising out of Case Crime No.0568 of 2017,u/s 420, 147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C, Police Station- Chinhat, District-Lucknow and Summoning Order dated 08.12.2022 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate III, Lucknow and Charge Sheet dated 16.09.2019."
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.5 to the application.
5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Parijat Singh, Kushagra Singh, Poornima Singh, Yogesh Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anuj Kumar And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.
6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.
7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 18, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 10771 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench