Allahabad High Court

WRIC/12109/2025 of MANSHARAM Vs STATE OF U.P THRU. SECY. REVENUE CIVIL SECTT. LKO.AND 3 OTHERS on 18 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12109 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - C No. - 12109 of 2025

Court No. - 2

HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.

HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents.

2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Opp. Party No. 2 & 3 to get free the portion of garden Bagh No.87 measuring areas 2 Beegha & 17 Biswa situated at Village Pure Panai, Majra Jarayal Khurd, Tehsil- Rudauli, District-Ayodhya of petitioner from the clutches of the Opp. Party No.4."

3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was the plaintiff no. 3 in Original Suit No. 264 of 1988, 'Ram Sajeevan and Others Vs. Bhai Lal and Others', and the father of the respondent no. 4 was the defendant no.9 in the said Suit. The said Suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiffs on 21.02.2005. However, now the respondent no. 4 is not respecting the decree and has tried to take over possession of the petitioner's land. The petitioner has moved several applications to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Rudauli, Ayodhya and also to the Station House Officer, Police Station- Patranga, District- Ayodhya, but no heed has been paid. Hence this writ petition has been filed with the aforesaid prayers. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Karan Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mansharam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P Thru. Secy. Revenue Civil Sectt. Lko.And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Civil Court for his grievance. We cannot direct the administrative authorities to take law into their own hands. December 18, 2025 Darpan Sharma WRIC No. 12109 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead