Allahabad High Court

A482/10758/2025 of VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 18 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10758 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. This application has been filed with the following prayer:-

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10758 of 2025

Court No. - 14

HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

2. This application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the impugned Charge sheet dated 21.10.2017 and the impugned summoning order dated 04.07.2019 as well as entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 37143 of 2019 "State Versus Vijay Kumar Shukla and Others" arising out of FIR No. 0054 of 2017 under section 323, 504, 506, 354(B) I.P.C. Police Station- Gosaiganj, District-Lucknow."

3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsels for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.

4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.

5. In view of above, it is provided that applicants may move his discharge application through counsel within three weeks from today and, in case, any such application is filed, the same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Utkarsh Misra, Abhishek Dwivedi, Kuldeep Narayan Mishra, Vinayak Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vijay Kumar Shukla And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

6. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the discharge application, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

7. With the above directions, this application is disposed of. December 18, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 10758 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead