Allahabad High Court
A482/10779/2025 of TAIYAB AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. IYTS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10779 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard. 2. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To set aside the impugned summoning order dated 20/10/2023 passed by learned Special Chief
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10779 of 2025
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To set aside the impugned summoning order dated 20/10/2023 passed by learned Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow, in Cri. Case No.0128/2023, arising out of FIR dated - 31/07/2023, U/s-323, 427, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Malihabad, District Lucknow (Annexure No 1), in light of Compromise Dated 10/12/2025 (Annexure No
6) ; to quash the FIR dated 31/07/2023 and Charge Sheet dated 21/08/2023 (Annexure No 2 & 3) submitted by the Investigating Office."
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.6 to the application.
4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.
5. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prabhaat Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Taiyab And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Iyts Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.
6. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
7. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
8. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 18, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 10779 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench