Allahabad High Court

A227/7320/2025 of RAM KRIPAL Vs DISTRICT MAGISTRTE, SULTANPUR AND OTHERS on 18 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7320 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for the State. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to the private respondent is dispensed with.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7320 of 2025

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for the State.

2. In view of the proposed order notice to the private respondent is dispensed with.

3. By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has sought a direction to Up- Ziladhikari, Tehsil Jaisinghpur, District Sultanpur to ensure compliance of his own order dated 10.5.2022 passed in case No.RST/3570/2017, computerized case No.T 2017046850073570 "Ram Kripal Vs. Gaon Sabha and others" under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code.

4. Learned Standing counsel, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has equally efficacious and alternate remedy by moving appropriate application under Section 22 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for fixing stones.

5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition and seeks liberty to approach competent authority.

6. The petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh application under Section 22 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for fixing stones.

7. In case, such an application is moved the competent authority shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. December 18, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Ram Kripal .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrte, Sultanpur And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead