Allahabad High Court
WRIC/12114/2025 of SATYENDRA SHUKLA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME CIVIL SECTT. GOVT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12114 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 12114 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite parties, more especially the opposite party No. 3 & 4, who are the members of the District Level Security Committee of the District- Sitapur, to provide the police security as the opposite party No. 6 is a hardened criminal and who given regular life threats to the petitioner."
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has lodged an FIR against the respondent no.6, who is a hardened criminal and being annoyed he has started threatening the petitioner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents has produced before this Court instructions sent by the In-charge Inspector, Kotwali Sidhauli, Sitapur wherein it has been stated that the petitioner has not made any application in the appropriate format to the District Level Security Committee. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arjun Singh Kalhans, Amit Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Satyendra Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Govt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. The written instructions are kept on record.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make his application in the proper format before the District Level Security Committee within ten days from today. If such an application is made, the same shall be considered by the District Level Security Committee and an appropriate order be passed thereon, as expeditiously as possible. December 18, 2025 Darpan Sharma WRIC No. 12114 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench