Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12830/2025 of SUNIL KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12830 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.125 of 2025, under
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12830 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.125 of 2025, under Sections 64(1), 332(b), 351(3) of BNS, Police Station Nawabganj, District Pratapgarh.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the husband of the informant used to stay at Pune and on 14.08.2025, at about 11:00, in the night, the applicant, who is the brother-in-law of the informant, committed wrong on her. The FIR in question was lodged on 23.08.2025. The victim is aged about 30 years. Subsequently, she has given an affidavit that on account of property dispute, the FIR in question was got lodged. The said affidavit is on record.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the manner, in which, the FIR has been lodged with the allegation of committing wrong and in the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the prosecution story has been supported and subsequently, an affidavit has been given by the victim aged about 30 years reflects the ground reality of the present society and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 24.08.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajeev Kumar Singh, Alok Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sunil Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Sunil Kumar be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 18, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12830 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench