Allahabad High Court
A227/7218/2025 of VEENA SINGH Vs M/S SM-ART CONSTRUCTIONS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM THRU. PARTNER SURENDRA KUMAR SONI AND 2 OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7218 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Pritish Kumar, the learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Ankit Srivastava, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rama Shankar Singh, the learned
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7218 of 2025
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Pritish Kumar, the learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Ankit Srivastava, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rama Shankar Singh, the learned counsel for the respondents.
2. After advancing submissions at great length, the learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer for a direction that the temporary injunction applications pending in Regular Suit No.2006 of 2025 titled Veena Singh v. Namrata Pandey and Anr and Regular Suit No.2357 of 2025 titled M/s SM Art Construction v. Veena Singh be decided expeditiously and till disposal of the applications, the parties may maintain status-quo regarding the properties.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents had submitted that the respondents are in possession of the properties and he has no objection to maintaining status-quo regarding titled of the properties by not creating third party interests till disposal of temporary injunction applications by the trial Court.
4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed off by directing the parties not to create third party interests in title and possession of the properties in dispute in the aforesaid suits. The learned Civil Judge (S.D.), Malihabad, Lucknow is directed to consolidate both the suits and proceed to decide the temporary injunction applications in both the suits expeditiously, after giving an adequate opportunity of hearing to the parties and thereafter to decide the suits expeditiously.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has expressed apprehensions against the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankit Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Deepak Kumar Tiwari Veena Singh .....Petitioner(s) M/S Sm-Art Constructions A Partnership Firm Thru. Partner Surendra Kumar Soni And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Presiding Officer of the Court of Civil Judge (S.D.), Malihabad, Lucknow and has prayed that the suit may be transferred to some other Court.
6. The learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that this request should be made by the petitioners by filing a transfer application before the District Judge and in case such an application is made, he will cooperate in its expeditious disposal. December 18, 2025 -Amit K- A227 No. 7218 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench