Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14596/2025 of DILIP KUMAR DUBEY AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY./ PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF FOREST LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 17 December 2025

Cites 1, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14596 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14596 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned state counsel for opposite parties.

2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay pension to the petitioners, counting the services rendered by them prior to their regularization on daily wage basis since February, 1985 and January, 1985 respectively, under the old pension scheme."

3. Learned counsel for petitioners have relied upon judgment rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and others reported in (2019) 10 SCC 516 as well as judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others [WRIT - A No. - 731 of 2024].

4. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Chandra Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dilip Kumar Dubey And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Forest Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

representation before opposite party No.2 i.e. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Head of Department, U.P. Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such representations are filed, the same is required to be decided in the light of judgments rendered in the cases of Prem Singh (supra) and Jai Ram Sharma (supra) in case the same are applicable, within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.

5. The petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 14596 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead