Allahabad High Court

A227/7241/2025 of PRATIMA TIWARI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR AYODHYA AND 3 OTHERS on 17 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7241 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records. 2. Keeping in view the reliefs sought and the order proposed to be passed

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7241 of 2025

Court No. - 17

HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records.

2. Keeping in view the reliefs sought and the order proposed to be passed issuance of notice to the opposite parties is dispensed with.

3. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ayodhya to decide the Case No.21 of 2024: Pratima Tiwari Vs. State and others, filed under Section 372 of Succession Act expeditiously.

4. The petitioner has filed the aforesaid succession application on 01.04.2024. One Raghvendra Mishra filed objection against the application on 08.11.2024.

5. A bare perusal of the order sheet indicates that on numerous occasions the case has been adjourned without assigning any reason.

6. In these circumstances, the petition is disposed of and a direction is issued to the learned learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ayodhya to decide the Case No.21 of 2024: Pratima Tiwari Vs. State and others, filed under Section 372 of Succession Act expeditiously in accordance with law without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties and by fixing dates at short intervals. December 17, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Pratima Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector Ayodhya And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead