Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14627/2025 of UMAKANT Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. WOMAN WELFARE ANUBHAG 1 LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 17 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14627 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "i. Issue a writ order or

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14627 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.

2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opp. parties concerned to pay the amount of gratuity as well as also pension to the petitioner sine the due date 01.12.2023 till its actual payment alongwith interest in accordance with law and also further when its may fall due in the interest of justice.

ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opp. parties concerned to pay the amount towards commutation of pension to the petitioner on the basis of total length service period i.e. 35 years with effect from 28.12.1988 to 30.11.2023 on the class IV post providing the benefit of the judgment Yatendra Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others dated 10.02.2025 and Kashiram alias Kashi Ram Vs. State of U.P. and others dated 04.11.2025 in the interest of justice."

3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director, Women Welfare, Jawahar Bhawan, 8th Floor, Lucknow who shall consider and decide the same Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Nath Pandey, Ram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Umakant .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Woman Welfare Anubhag 1 Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.

4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 17, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 14627 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead