Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14680/2025 of NAND KISHORE Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPTT. , LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 17 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14680 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:- "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14680 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:- "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties particularly opposite party no. 1 to consider and grant 3rd ACP, Pay Band Rs.15,600-39,100, Grade Pay Rs. 7600 w.e.f. 01.12.2008 with all subsequential benefits, fixation of pay from the said date i.e. 01.12.2008 to the date of retirement i.e. 31.01.2009, revision of all pensionary benefit on the said basis viz. admissible leave encashment of the earned leave, pension, commutation of pension and gratuity payment of all with interest from the due date till actual payment at the current market rate, in the interest of justice.."
3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 1 i.e. Principal Secretary, Irrigation and Water Resources Department, Government of U.P., Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. The petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Priya Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Nand Kishore .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Irrigation And Water Resources Deptt. , Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench