Allahabad High Court
A227/7276/2025 of AKBAL BAHADUR AND OTHERS Vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, GONDA AND ANOTHER on 17 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7276 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing counsel for the State respondent. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7276 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing counsel for the State respondent. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed with.
2. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed praying for expeditious disposal of stay application moved by the petitioner in Revision No.0325/2023, computerized case No.202354083000000325 under Section 48 (1) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act titled as "Akbal Bahadur and others vs. Brijendra Kumar Singh and others" pending before respondent No.1 i.e. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Gonda.
3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in the revision preferred by the petitioner no interim order has been passed on the application for interim relief while on the other hand interference is being caused by the respondents on the disputed property for which there is requirement for expeditious disposal of the interim relief application. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer.
4. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decided the application for interim relief with expedition, say within six weeks from the date service has been effected on the respondents, in case there is no legal impediment. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter.
5. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for interim relief the respondent No.1 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. December 17, 2025/RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Janardan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Akbal Bahadur And Others .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Gonda And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench