Allahabad High Court
WRIC/12250/2025 of NARESH PAL SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 17 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12250 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Amar Nath Dubey, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Anil Kumar Kushwaha, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State, Sri Pravin Kumar Singh,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 12250 of 2025
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Amar Nath Dubey, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Anil Kumar Kushwaha, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State, Sri Pravin Kumar Singh, Advocate who has put in appearance on behalf of the opposite party no.3-U.P. Gramin Bank and filed his vakalatnama, which is taken on record.
2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have challenged the recovery proceedings initiated due to default committed by them in repayment of a loan taken from the opposite party no.3.
3. The learned counsel for the opposite party no.3 has stated that earlier also upon a default having been committed recovery proceedings have been instituted whereupon the petitioners has filed Writ-C No.11015 of 2023, which was disposed by means of an order dated 20.12.2023, passed by a Division Bench of this Court directing that the petitioners should deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/ each with the respondent bank within a period of one month and the rest amount would be paid in six half yearly installments and the interest shall be paid with the last installment. The petitioners have not obeyed the order dated 20.12.2023 and they have filed a fresh petition, which is not maintainable.
4. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that he does Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Nath Dubey, Ankit Dubey, Lalit Shukla, Swati Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Avdhesh Shukla Naresh Pal Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
not want to press the petition and he will file an appropriate application in the earlier writ petition.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. December 17, 2025 Ram. WRIC No. 12250 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench