Allahabad High Court
A227/7282/2025 of OM PRAKASH TIWARI Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER JUDICIAL, AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND OTHERS on 17 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7282 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.3- Nagar Nigam has been accepted by
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7282 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.3- Nagar Nigam has been accepted by Sri Patanjali Chaturvedi.
2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide revision No.02007 of 2018 under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid case is considered and decided in a time bound manner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1- Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to decide revision No.02007 of 2018 under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, Anchal Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Patanjali Chaturvedi (Alok Mathur,J.) Om Prakash Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench