Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14551/2025 of ASHOK KUMAR SHUKLA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. EXCISE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 17 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14551 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "(i) To issue a Writ,

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14551 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties.

2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "(i) To issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to release salary of petitioner in terms of verification report submitted by Assistant Excise Commissioner Basti letter dated 17.11.2025, and sanctioned the medical leave in terms of letter dated 11.11.2025 issued by Deputy Excise Commissioner and thereafter allowed the pay increment from year 2012 to 2020 and release the retiral dues along with interest @24% per annum from the date of retirement till the date of actual payment, in the interest of justice.

(ii) To issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to consider and grant the benefits of ACP and others service benefits in terms of prevalent Government Orders and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Birendra Kumar Yadav, Amit Kumar, Hema Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ashok Kumar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Excise Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

accordingly revise the pay and pension along with consequential service benefit, in the interest of justice."

3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.2 i.e. Excise Commissioner U.P. Prayagraj, Camp Office, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.

4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 14551 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead