Allahabad High Court

WRIC/12136/2025 of SANDEEP SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PANCHYAT RAJ DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS on 17 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12136 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Shubhranshu Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.K. Khare, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - C No. - 12136 of 2025

Court No. - 17

HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Shri Shubhranshu Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.K. Khare, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to take appropriate action upon the petitioner's complaint dated 31.10.2025 for conducting an inquiry under Section 95(1)(g) of UP Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 against the respondent no.6.

3. Keeping in view the nature of the relief sought and order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondents is hereby dispensed with.

4. On the basis of written instruction dated 16.12.2025 duly signed by District Panchayat Raj Officer, Gonda placed before this Court by the learned Standing Counsel, it has been informed that on 16.12.2025, an Inquiry Officer has been appointed for conducting an inquiry into the allegations against the respondent no.6. Further action will be taken upon receipt of the inquiry report which has been directed to be submitted within a period of one month.

5. The photocopy of the aforesaid instruction is taken on record.

6. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed off.

7. In case, no further action has been taken in furtherance of the inquiry as stated in the written instruction, the petitioner will be at liberty to file a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shubhranshu Verma, Nilesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sandeep Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Panchyat Raj Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)

fresh petition. December 17, 2025 V. Sinha WRIC No. 12136 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead