Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14643/2025 of RAJU Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. / ADDL. CHIEF SECY. P.W.D. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 17 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14643 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) issue a writ, order or
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14643 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned Counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to treat the appointment of the petitioner as permanent appointment from the date of his initial appointment and regularize the services of the petitioner along with all consequential benefits and arrears on the post upon which he was initially appointed on a compassionate basis under the Rule 1974 and also direct the opposite parties to pay the regular pay scale for the post to which he was appointed on the initial date of appointment along with other admissible benefits and interest."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.5 i.e. Executive Engineer, Works Division - 3, Public Works Department (PWD), Barabanki, District Barabanki, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 17, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Om Gupta, Sachin Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Raju .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. / Addl. Chief Secy. P.W.D. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench