Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14618/2025 of SWASTIKA JAISWAL Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FINANCE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 17 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14618 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ in the nature
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14618 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ in the nature of MANDAMUS, directing the respondent no. 2 to grant promotion to the petitioner to the post of Accountant with retrospective effect from 06.02.2025 taking into consideration the petitioner's Annual Confidential Report (ACR) for 2023-24 which was submitted on 08.01.2025 (Annexure No.7) in the interest of justice.
II. Issue a writ in the nature of MANDAMUS, directing the respondents no.2 to extend all the consequential benefits, including the revised pay with retrospective effect from the date of 06.02.2025 (Annexure No.8) in the interest of justice."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director, Directorate of Internal Audit and Accounts, U.P., Lucknow, or any other competent authority, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 17, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Mishra, Avinash Dwivedi, Bhavya Dwivedi, Divya Dwivedi, Rahul Kant Mishra, Sampurnanand Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Swastika Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Finance Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench