Allahabad High Court

WRIC/12257/2025 of ER. D.P.SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. CHIEF SECY. GOVT. SECTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 17 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12257 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Sameer Agarwal, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri U.C. Singh, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. 2. By means of the instant writ

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - C No. - 12257 of 2025

Court No. - 17

HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Sameer Agarwal, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri U.C. Singh, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of U.P.

2. By means of the instant writ petition the petitioner has challenged validity of an order dated 24.10.2025 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, Lucknow Division, Lucknow referring dispute regarding election of Associated Chamber of Commerce and Industries of U.P. to the Prescribed Authority/SDM under Section 25(1) of the Societies Registration Act.

3. Although the learned counsel for the petitioner has advanced submissions at great length but ultimately he confined his submission for issuance of a direction to the Prescribed Authority/SDM, Sadar, Lucknow to decide the proceedings under Section 25(1) of the Societies Registration Act expeditiously after taking into consideration all the pleas and objections raised by the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection against this limited submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner which can be accepted without issuance of notice to the opposite party no.

5.

5. Accordingly, issuance of notice to the opposite party no. 5 is dispensed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Riya Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Er. D.P.Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Govt. Sectt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)

with.

6. This petition is disposed of by directing the Prescribed Authority/ SDM, Sadar, Lucknow to dispose of the proceedings under Section 25(1) of the Societies Registration Act concerning Associated Chamber of Commerce and Industries of U.P. expeditiously, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties and after taking into consideration all he pleas raised by the petitioner. December 17, 2025 Pradeep/- WRIC No. 12257 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead