Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14625/2025 of VIBHA MISHRA Vs UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF RAILWAY NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS on 17 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14625 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. S. B. Pandey, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India assisted by Mr. Varun Pandey, learned counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14625 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. S. B. Pandey, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India assisted by Mr. Varun Pandey, learned counsel for opposite parties.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "I. issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ nature of Mandamus, commanding the opposite parties, directing the Opposite Party no.2 to provide the benefit of medical facilities and free railway journey pass to the petitioner as payable to the dependent of retired Railway employee.
II. issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ nature of Mandamus, commanding the opposite parties, directing the Opposite Party no.2 to consider and decide the application/representation of the petitioner for providing medical facilities and free railway journey pass to the petitioner dated 09.06.2025 contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Kumar Singh, Vishwas Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. Vibha Mishra .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Railway New Delhi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.2 i.e. Divisional Regional Manager Northern Railway, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
December 17, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 14625 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench