Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14619/2025 of SANTOSH KUMAR SRIVASTAV Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (COOPERATIVE) LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 17 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14619 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "I. Issue a writ order or
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14619 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties, specially the Opposite Party No.3, to pay the Gratuity to the Petitioner, as per the Dearness Allowance as increased by the state government vide government order dated 09/04/25 effective from 01/01/25, pursuant to his services of 37 years and 11 months and 11 days amounting to Rs.1498695 (Rs Fourteen Lakh Ninety Eight thousand Six hundred ninety five only) along with interest @ 18% till the date of actual payment, within the time frame as stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties, especially the Opposite Party No.3, to pay the arrears of pension for the month July to November 2025 along with 18% interest thereupon till actual date of payment, in the interest of justice."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nirankar Singh, Pawan Gupta, Rajani Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Santosh Kumar Srivastav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Cooperative) Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
before opposite party no.3 i.e. Additional Commissioner-cum- Additional Registrar (Banking), Co-operative Societies, UP, 14, Ambedkar Marg, Lucknow, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 17, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 14619 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench