Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14580/2025 of DAYA RAM VERMA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 17 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14580 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "(i) ISSUE, a writ order or
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14580 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "(i) ISSUE, a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make the payment of the arrear of salary to the petitioner from the date of order passed by this Hon'ble court i.e. 19.10.2006 till the date of his re-joining on the post of collection Amin i.e. 05.06.2012 whereby, the arrears of the salary to the similarly situated person namely Pratap Narain Pandey has been provided as per the direction issued by this Hon'ble court along with the interest admissible under the law."
3. It is submitted that one Pratap Narain Pandey had filed Writ Petition No.4031 (S/S) of 2001 challenging certain orders as well as seeking a direction for treating petitioner as regular collection amin from the date of initial Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Daya Ram Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
appointment and for payment of consequential service benefits. The said petition was allowed by means of judgment and order dated 19.08.2006 and benefit of same was also provided to petitioner in Writ Petition No.8672 (S/S) of 2006. In pursuance thereof certain service benefit has already been provided to petitioner while certain other benefits including arrears of salary for the said period is not yet paid.
5. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.3 i.e. District Magistrate, Sultanpur. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided in the light of aforesaid judgments in case the same are applicable within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 14580 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench