Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14622/2025 of DEENANATH YADAV (PNO-892350102) AND 12 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 17 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14622 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) Issue a writ, order or
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14622 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the respondent authority to take into consideration the service period spent by the petitioners, while undergoing training before they were appointed as constables for calculating 19 years of service for granting one additional increment according to the Government order dated 02-12-2000.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the respondent to calculate the service period of the petitioners from the date of appointment and granted one additional increment."
3. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file individual fresh representations before opposite party no.3 i.e. The Deputy Inspector General of Police (Estab.), Police Headquarter, Lucknow, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representations along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 17, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Deenanath Yadav (Pno-892350102) And 12 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench