Allahabad High Court
A482/9894/2025 of MOHD. KALEEM AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME GOVT. U.P. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER on 17 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9894 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. This application has been filed with the following prayer:-
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9894 of 2025
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. This application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the order dated 14.10.2024 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VII, Lucknow and charge sheet dated 26.07.2024, contained in annexure no.1 & 2, respectively to this application as well as entire proceeding of Case No.88702/2024 "State Vs. Azam & others" pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Lucknow."
3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.
5. In view of above, it is provided that applicants may move his discharge application through counsel within three weeks from today and, in case, any such application is filed, the same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Farhan Alam Osmany Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Kaleem And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Govt. U.P. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order.
6. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the discharge application, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
7. With the above directions, this application is disposed of. December 17, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 9894 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench