Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14675/2025 of DR. SHASHANK KUMAR SINHA @ DR. SHASHANKO KUMAR SINHA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 17 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14675 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "i. To issue writ order or direction in the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14675 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.

2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "i. To issue writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the opposite parties to fix the salary of the petitioner and re-determine the pension of the petitioner in light of Office Memorandum No. 598/8.5-2-पांच 05-7(132)/03 dated 02/02/2005 giving notional promotion to the petitioner with retrospective effect as directed in the said Office Memorandum No. 598/8.5-2-पांच 05-7(132)/03 dated 02/02/2005 and is contained as Annexure No.1, with the writ petition.

ii. To issue writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the opposite parties to pay the arrears after fixing the salary of the petitioner and re- determine the pension of the petitioner in light of Office Memorandum No. 598/8.5-2- पांच 05-7(132)/03 dated 02/02/2005 giving notional promotion to the petitioner with retrospective effect as directed in the said Office Memorandum No. 598/8.5-2-पांच 05- 7(132)/03 dated 02/02/2005."

3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Director General, Medical and Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.

4. The petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Madhusudan Srivastava, Madhav Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Dr. Shashank Kumar Sinha @ Dr. Shashanko Kumar Sinha .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical And Health Services Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead