Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14661/2025 of NEHA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF GRAM VIKAS LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 17 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14661 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the authority concerned to consider petitioner's

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14661 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.

2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the authority concerned to consider petitioner's application for compassionate appointment in terms of Rule 24 of Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974.

3. It has been submitted that mother of the petitioner passed away in harness on 06.02.2021, whereafter petitioner attained majority on 09.03.2023 and has filed applications on 12.07.2024, 13.02.2025 and 30.05.2025 which are still pending consideration.

4. In view of prayer being made, opposite party No.2, i.e., Director General, Uttar Pradesh, Directorate of Deen Dayal Upadhyay Rajya Gram Vikas Sansthan, Bakshi-ka-Talab, Lucknow or any other competent authority is directed to decide the applications preferred by the petitioner for compassionate appointment, expeditiously, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon the said authority. Petitioner shall annexe copies of applications for compassionate appointment along with a certified copy of this order.

5. With the aforesaid direction(s), petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar, Pramod Kumar Khare, Rachna Shukla, Ramraj, Shreyansh Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Neha .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Gram Vikas Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead