Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14576/2025 of KAPIL DEV PANDEY Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 17 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14576 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "(i) Issue a Writ, order or

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14576 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties.

2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "(i) Issue a Writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opp. Parties by directing them to consider the petitioner's claim for regularization/appointment under the Uttar Pradesh Collection Amin's Service Rules, 1974 on the post of Collection Amin since the date Junior to the petitioner namely Shri Ram Shankar and Shri Ram Sumiran were regularized in service.

(ii) Issue a Writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opp. Parties particularly o.p.no.2 by directing him to provide all consequential service benefits to the petitioner from the date junior to the petitioner regularized in service i.e. 8.3.2019."

3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Pandey, Suyash Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kapil Dev Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.2 i.e. Ziladhikari/ Collector, Amethi. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.

4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 14576 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead