Allahabad High Court

WRIC/11633/2025 of RAVI SHANKAR SHUKLA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADD. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 17 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11633 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - C No. - 11633 of 2025

Court No. - 3

HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.

HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated September 10, 2025 filed by the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided.

4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner.

5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2/ District Magistrate, Ayodhya is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. December 17, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhanu Pratap Mishra, Sachin Tiwari, Vineet Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ravi Shankar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Add. Chief Secy. Deptt. Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead