Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12784/2025 of SURAJ SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. on 17 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12784 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Mohd. Nafeesh Quraishi, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Mayank Sinha, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This is
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12784 of 2025
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Mohd. Nafeesh Quraishi, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Mayank Sinha, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. This is the second application seeking release of the application on bail in Case Crime No.371/2022, under Sections 120B, 323, 364, 302, 201 IPC, Police Station Krishna Nagar, District Lucknow.
3. The first application No.595/2023 was rejected by means of an order dated 02.04.2024. Subsequent to rejection of the first bail application, all the prosecution witnesses have been examined and the case has reached the stage of recording statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.
4. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 25.09.2022 i.e. for more than 3 years; that the applicant has no criminal history; the dead body has not been recovered and it is a case of circumstantial evidence only; the entire prosecution evidence stands concluded and in case of his release on bail, the applicant will not be in a position to influence the witnesses or tamper with the evidence.
5. Co-accused persons namely, Shubham Pal @ Shivam @ Karan and Abhinav Pal @ Nanu have already been granted bail in the present case Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Nafeesh Quraishi, Qumruzzafar Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Suraj Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
by means of orders dated 11.11.2025 and 08.12.2025 passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Applications No. 2911 of 2025 and 12019 of 2025 respectively. .
6. Without entering into the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail.
7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.
8. Let the applicant-Suraj Singh be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: -
(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;
(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. December 17, 2025 Pradeep/- BAIL No. 12784 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench