Allahabad High Court

WRIC/11840/2025 of RAM KUMARI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. / PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS on 17 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11840 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. In the present writ petition, the following prayer has been made:- "To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the Respondent

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - C No. - 11840 of 2025

Court No. - 3

HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.

HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. In the present writ petition, the following prayer has been made:- "To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the Respondent No. 2 to grant ex-gratia compensation amount to the petitioner, as recommended by the District Magistrate, Raebareli (Respondent No.4) vide report dated 22.03.2023, in terms of the Government Order dated 01.06.2021, within such reasonable time frame as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper."

2. We have heard the counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the State has submitted that the recommendation given by the District Magistrate, Rae Bareli is being acted upon by the authorities and the ex-gratia payment to be made to the petitioner is under process.

4. He submits that the payment shall be made within a period of two months.

5. We have recorded the said undertaking and accordingly the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities to ensure that the payment is made to the petitioner within a period of two months from date.

6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. December 17, 2025 Anurag Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Maria Fatima, Akber Ahmad, Rama Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ayush Chaudhary (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ram Kumari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. / Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead