Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14689/2025 of RAMA NAND YADAV (PNO-952321358) AND 17 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS on 17 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14689 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to take into consideration period

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14689 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.

2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to take into consideration period spent by petitioners undergoing training after appointments and before being posted as Constable for calculating 19 years of service regarding grant of one additional increment/selection grade in the light of Government Order dated 02.12.2000.

3. It is submitted that petitioners' case is squarely covered by judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Ghanshyam Tiwari and others versus State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc. Writ-A No. 44330 of 2012) against which special appeal and special leave petition have also been dismissed.

4. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file a fresh representation before the concerned authority, who shall consider and decide the same in the light of aforesaid judgment in the case of Ghyanshyam Tiwari (supra) in case the same is applicable within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the concerned authority.

5. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Kumar Verma, Prinsi Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Rama Nand Yadav (Pno-952321358) And 17 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead