Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14692/2025 of VISHWANATH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 17 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14692 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "I-Issue a writ, order or direction in the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14692 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "I-Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to pay the interest on delay payment of post-retirement dues and other dues at the rate of 18% per annum as stated in para 10 of the writ petition on the basis of the Judgment and order namely Vijay L. Mehrotra and Krishna Mohan Verma. II- Issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to give the interest on delay payment of post-retirement dues and other dues as stated in para 10 of the writ petition on the basis of the government order dated 06-12-1994 and the government order dated 30-09-2009 which are contained as Annexure No. 4 and 5 to the Writ Petition."
3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Musafirkhana, District Amethi. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided in the light of government order dated 30.9.2009 indicated in prayer No.2 in case same is applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. The petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Vishwanath .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench