Allahabad High Court

WRIC/12025/2025 of SRI BALDESHIK SOPAN TRUST THRU. MANAGING TRUSTEE/PRESIDENT,GOVIND KUMAR LOHIA AND 9 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. INSTITUTIONAL FINANCE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 16 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12025 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Sharad Pathak, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Pawan Kumar Pandey and Ms. Priya Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, the learned

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - C No. - 12025 of 2025

Court No. - 17

HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Sharad Pathak, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Pawan Kumar Pandey and Ms. Priya Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State- opposite parties no.1 and 2, Sri H.G.S. Parihar, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Amit Singh, the learned counsel for the opposite parties no.3 and 4 and perused the records.

2. By means of the instant petition the petitioners have challenged the validity of an order dated 31.10.2025, passed by the opposite party no.2/Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies & Chits Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, whereby the earlier office order dated 17.10.2025 was declared to be ineffective till further orders and 18.11.2025 was fixed for hearing.

3. Although, elaborated submissions have been advanced by the learned counsel for parties, when Sri H.G.S. Parihar, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties no.3 and 4 has conceded that he will have no objection in case the impugned order dated 31.10.2025 is modified to the extent that the part of the order which provides that earlier office order dated 17.10.2025 will be ineffective, be set aside and the matter be left open to be Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Priya Singh, Pawan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Amit Singh Sri Baldeshik Sopan Trust Thru. Managing Trustee/President,Govind Kumar Lohia And 9 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Institutional Finance Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

decided by the Deputy Registrar after taking into consideration all the pleas raised by the parties.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the aforesaid proposal.

5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of by modifying the impugned order dated 31.10.2025, passed by the Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies & Chits Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to the effect that the earlier office order dated 17.10.2025 passed by the Deputy Registrar shall remain operative till a fresh decision is taken by the Deputy Registrar after giving the parties concerned an opportunity of hearing and after taking into consideration all the pleas raised by the parties expeditiously in accordance with law preferably within a period of three weeks from today.

6. It is clarified that this court has not entered into the merits and demerits of the rival claims of parties which is left open to be decided by the opposite party no.2 in accordance with law. None of the parties shall take any action detrimental to the interests of the trust and only day to day affairs will be managed. December 16, 2025 Ram. WRIC No. 12025 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead