Allahabad High Court
/1416/2020 of SANJAY YADAV SANJAY KUMAR and OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. and ORS. on 16 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1416 of 2020 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 to 4. 2. The present application has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1416 of 2020
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 to 4.
2. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings of S.T. No. 85 of 2014 arising out of Case Crime No. 383 of 2013, under Sections 307, 323 I.P.C., P.S. Fatehpur, District Barabanki.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 jointly submit that in pursuance of the earlier order dated 03.03.2020 passed in the present case, the matter was sent before the court below for verification of the compromise deed.
4. It is evident from the record that the factum of the compromise has been verified by the court below vide his report dated 15.07.2020. The compromise deed is annexed along with C.M. Application No. 2 of 2024, which goes to show that respondent nos. 2 to 4 does not want to prosecute the applicant.
5. Learned A.G.A. fairly concedes that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abdul Rafey Siddiqui, Anil Kumar Yadav, Arshad Hafeez Khan, Dinesh Kr. Sharma, Manoj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Devansh Singh Chauhan, Nilesh Kumar Rao, Ziauddin Khan Sanjay Yadav Sanjay Kumar And Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Ors. .....Opposite Party(s)
by the court below.
6. Hon'ble Apex Court, in catena of decisions, viz., Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties.
7. In view of the aforesaid fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further and the matter has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter any further.
8. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed.
9. Entire proceedings of S.T. No. 85 of 2014 arising out of Case Crime No. 383 of 2013, under Sections 307, 323 I.P.C., P.S. Fatehpur, District Barabanki are hereby quashed.
10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned, forthwith. December 16, 2025 VKS A482 No. 1416 of 2020 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench